Abstract

ObjectiveThe γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) is a new method for quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and [123I]N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP). The present study aimed to validate the REICA method using data including acetazolamide challenge test.MethodsThe REICA and Graph-Plot (GP) methods were used to calculate mean CBF (mCBF) for 92 acquisitions (rest: 57, stress: 35) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 33 patients. To obtain stress data, 15 mg/kg of acetazolamide was injected intravenously 10 min before the administration of 123I-IMP, and blood samples were collected under the same conditions as rest data. The reference standard was the Autoradiograph (ARG) method using arterial blood sampling, and the accuracy of the REICA method was analyzed by comparing it with each method.ResultsFor mCBF, the correlation coefficients (r) were 0.792 for the REICA method and 0.636 for the GP method. For CVR, r values were 0.660 for the REICA method and 0.578 for the GP method. In both acquisitions, the REICA method had a stronger correlation with the ARG method than the GP method. For mCBF, there was a significant difference in the correlation coefficient between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe REICA method was more accurate than the GP method in quantifying CBF and closer to the ARG method. The REICA method, which is a noninvasive method of cerebral blood flow quantification using 123I-IMP, has great medical usefulness.

Highlights

  • Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), which evaluates ischemic cerebrovascular disease [1] and diagnoses dementia [2], can aid in determining treatment strategies as well as therapeutic and surgical effects through analyses of cerebral blood flow (CBF) [3]

  • The difference between the two correlation coefficients was significant at p = 7.30 × ­10–3, indicating that the REICA method had a stronger correlation with the ARG method than the GP method

  • Especially for mean CBF (mCBF), there was a significant difference between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.01), proving the high accuracy of the REICA method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), which evaluates ischemic cerebrovascular disease [1] and diagnoses dementia [2], can aid in determining treatment strategies as well as therapeutic and surgical effects through analyses of cerebral blood flow (CBF) [3]. In the quantification of cerebral blood flow by SPECT, the Autoradiograph (ARG) method [11] is a simplified version of the Table Look Up method [12] based on a one-tissue, two-compartment model. The ARG method, which requires arterial blood sampling, is the standard method for CBF quantification using 123I-IMP. Graph-Plot (GP) method [13], another method of CBF quantification that does not use arterial blood sampling has some serious methodological flaws. It is not appropriate to use pulmonary artery measurements as the input function [14]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call