Abstract
BackgroundThe National Death Index (NDI) is a centralized database containing information from death certificates that is frequently referenced by health and medical investigators to ascertain vital statistics. Yet, it commonly includes misclassified causes of death. Since the NDI is frequently relied upon in studies that evaluate outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC), we evaluated its validity by referencing mortality data from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database which is a prospectively managed database of 5,009 Veterans who underwent a RP at eight Veterans Affairs medical centers between 1982 and 2016.MethodsWe compared vital status, cause of death and date of death from the SEARCH database with the NDI.ResultsA total of 1,312 men in SEARCH were deceased, yet the NDI reported 17% (219) of those men as still alive. Among the 1,093 men who had concordant vital status in both SEARCH and NDI, the date of death was an exact match within one day, a week, or 31 days in 94%, 97%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. Of those men coded as dying from prostate cancer in the SEARCH database (n=105), 12% were coded as having died from non-PC causes in the NDI. Meanwhile, among patients coded by the NDI as having died of PC (n=139), 34% were coded in SEARCH as having died of non-PC causes.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the NDI provides accurate dates of death, but frequently misclassifies whether a death was due to prostate cancer. Studies that rely upon death certificates, as capture in the NDI, may be unreliable to report prostate cancer specific mortality rates after prostatectomy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.