Abstract
PURPOSE: The study was designed to assess if category-based Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) could be substituted for exact-frequency based questionnaires. METHODS: Nutrient estimates on 203 subjects from Toronto, Canada, derived from recoding an exact frequency based 132 item food frequency questionnaire (E-FFQ) into categories were evaluated for validity against a 7-day food record (FR). RESULTS: Among men, the median Pearson's correlation coefficient (for energy adjusted nutrients) between FR and E-FFQ was 0.53, ranging from 0.26 for thiamin to 0.72 for calcium. The median correlation dropped to a value of 0.40 (range: 0.18 for thiamin to 0.56 for carbohydrate) when a category-based FFQ (C-FFQ) and FR were compared. Data on women showed a similar pattern; a median correlation of 0.50 from E-FFQ and 0.42 from C-FFQ. CONCLUSIONS: While the results varied with individual nutrients, overall it is concluded that when validated against food records, the use of exact frequencies in FFQs yielded higher correlation coefficients for most nutrients, and slightly better agreement within quartiles of categories than recoded frequency categories.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
