Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the predictive validity of academic grades and G-36 scores in personnel selection. The sample was compose by 83 individuals from public organization with mean age of 22.01 (SD=2.99) years old, being 81.9% males and 91.6% with eleven years of education (High School at least). Pearson correlation and regression analysis were used to verify the association between training performance and both predictors. Significant correlations were observed between variables range. Linear regression indicated a shared variance of 23.0% between G-36 and theoretical disciplines results. New research could be development to investigate the contribution of knowledge tests to personnel selection.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to investigate the predictive validity of academic grades and G-36 scores in personnel selection

  • Results indicated that individuals with higher general cognitive ability had higher scores in training measures

  • That results obtained by Schimdt and Hunter (1998) indicate that 31% of the variance of performance at a training program was explained by general cognitive ability, a higher value than the one obtained in present study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the predictive validity of academic grades and G-36 scores in personnel selection. According to Brazilian Federal Constitution, selection processes for public office should happen based on written tests of knowledge and titles so as to guarantee the democratization of accessibility to these jobs In this sense, the application of objective psychological and knowledge tests in public contests meets the underlying constitutional principles relating to the legality, impersonality, administrative morality and publicity (Brasil, 1998; 2009). The application of objective psychological and knowledge tests in public contests meets the underlying constitutional principles relating to the legality, impersonality, administrative morality and publicity (Brasil, 1998; 2009) These resources are often used simultaneously in order to assess the cognitive capacity of candidates’ for a certain job or position. Greater importance is given to knowledge tests and it is assumed that good performance in these tests is related to applicants with greatest potential to carry out tasks at work (Queiroga, 2009)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.