Validity of fatty liver prediction scores for diagnosis of fatty liver by Fibroscan

Abstract

BackgroundThe Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (K-NAFLD) score was recently developed with the intent to operationally define nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remained an external validation that confirmed its diagnostic performance, especially in patients with alcohol consumption or hepatitis virus infection. MethodsDiagnostic accuracy of the K-NAFLD score was evaluated in a hospital-based cohort consisting of 1388 participants who received Fibroscan®. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression models and the contrast estimation of receiver operating characteristic curves were used for validation of the K-NAFLD score, fatty liver index (FLI), and hepatic steatosis index (HSI). ResultsK-NAFLD-moderate [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-5.65] and K-NAFLD-high (aOR = 4.14, 95% CI: 1.69-10.13) groups showed higher risks of fatty liver compared to the K-NAFLD-low group after adjustments for demographic and clinical characteristics, and FLI-moderate and FLI-high groups revealed aORs of 2.05 (95% CI: 1.22-3.43) and 1.51 (95% CI: 0.78-2.90), respectively. In addition, the HSI was less predictive for Fibroscan®-defined fatty liver. Both K-NAFLD and FLI also demonstrated high accuracy in the prediction of fatty liver in patients with alcohol consumption and chronic hepatitis virus infection, and the adjusted area under curve values were comparable between K-NAFLD and FLI. ConclusionsExternally validation of the K-NAFLD and FLI showed that these scores may be a useful, noninvasive, and non-imaging modality for the identification of fatty liver. In addition, these scores also predicted fatty liver in patients with alcohol consumption and chronic hepatitis virus infection.