Validity of a Telephone-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall in Telephone and Non-Telephone Households in the Rural Lower Mississippi Delta Region

Abstract

Objective To determine if 24-hour dietary recall data are influenced by whether data are collected by telephone or face-to-face interviews in telephone and non-telephone households. Design Dual sampling frame of telephone and non-telephone households. In telephone households, participants completed a 24-hour dietary recall either by face-to-face interview or telephone interview. In non-telephone households, participants completed a 24-hour dietary recall either by face-to-face interview or by using a cellular telephone provided by a field interviewer. Subjects/setting Four hundred nine participants from the rural Delta region of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Main outcome measures Mean energy and protein intakes. Statistical analyses performed Comparison of telephone and non-telephone households, controlling for type of interview, and comparison of telephone and face-to-face interviews in each household type using unpaired t tests and linear regression, adjusting for gender, age, and body mass index. Results Mean differences between telephone and face-to-face interviews for telephone households were −171 kcal ( P=0.1) and −6.9 g protein ( P=0.2), and for non-telephone households −143 kcal ( P=0.6) and 0.4 g protein ( P=1.0). Mean differences between telephone and non-telephone households for telephone interviews were 0 kcal ( P=1.0) and −0.9 g protein ( P=0.9), and for face-to-face interviews 28 kcal ( P=0.9) and 6.4 g protein ( P=0.5). Findings persisted when adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index. No statistically significant differences were detected for mean energy or protein intake between telephone and face-to-face interviews or between telephone and non-telephone households. Applications/conclusions These data provide support that telephone surveys adequately describe energy and protein intakes for a rural, low-income population. J Am Diet Assoc 2001:101:216-222.