Validity of a smartphone protractor to measure sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity

Abstract

Background ContextSmartphones have become an integral tool in the daily life of health-care professionals (Franko 2011). Their ease of use and wide availability often make smartphones the first tool surgeons use to perform measurements. This technique has been validated for certain orthopedic pathologies (Shaw 2012; Quek 2014; Milanese 2014; Milani 2014), but never to assess sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity (ASD). This study was designed to assess the validity, reproducibility, precision, and efficiency of using a smartphone protractor application to measure sagittal parameters commonly measured in ASD assessment and surgical planning. PurposeThis study aimed to (1) determine the validity of smartphone protractor applications, (2) determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of smartphone protractor applications when used to measure sagittal parameters in ASD, (3) determine the efficiency of using a smartphone protractor application to measure sagittal parameters, and (4) elucidate whether a physician's level of experience impacts the reliability or validity of using a smartphone protractor application to measure sagittal parameters in ASD. Study Design/SettingAn experimental validation study was carried out. MethodsThirty standard 36″ standing lateral radiographs were examined. Three separate measurements were performed using a marker and protractor; then at a separate time point, three separate measurements were performed using a smartphone protractor application for all 30 radiographs. The first 10 radiographs were then re-measured two more times, for a total of three measurements from both the smartphone protractor and marker and protractor. The parameters included lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Three raters performed all measurements—a junior level orthopedic resident, a senior level orthopedic resident, and a fellowship-trained spinal deformity surgeon. All data, including the time to perform the measurements, were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed to determine intra- and interobserver reliability, as well as accuracy, efficiency, and precision. Statistical analysis using the intra- and interclass correlation coefficient was calculated using R (version 3.3.2, 2016) to determine the degree of intra- and interobserver reliability. ResultsHigh rates of intra- and interobserver reliability were observed between the junior resident, senior resident, and attending surgeon when using the smartphone protractor application as demonstrated by high inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients greater than 0.909 and 0.874 respectively. High rates of inter- and intraobserver reliability were also seen between the junior resident, senior resident, and attending surgeon when a marker and protractor were used as demonstrated by high inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients greater than 0.909 and 0.807 respectively. The lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt values were accurately measured by all three raters, with excellent inter- and intra-class correlation coefficient values. When the first 10 radiographs were re-measured at different time points, a high degree of precision was noted. Measurements performed using the smartphone application were consistently faster than using a marker and protractor—this difference reached statistical significance of p<.05. ConclusionsAdult spinal deformity radiographic parameters can be measured accurately, precisely, reliably, and more efficiently using a smartphone protractor application than with a standard protractor and wax pencil. A high degree of intra- and interobserver reliability was seen between the residents and attending surgeon, indicating measurements made with a smartphone protractor are unaffected by an observer's level of experience. As a result, smartphone protractors may be used when planning ASD surgery.