Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a modelling technique increasingly used in anatomical studies investigating skeletal form and function. In the case of the cranium this approach has been applied to both living and fossil taxa to (for example) investigate how form relates to function or infer diet or behaviour. However, FE models of complex musculoskeletal structures always rely on simplified representations because it is impossible completely to image and represent every detail of skeletal morphology, variations in material properties and the complexities of loading at all spatial and temporal scales. The effects of necessary simplifications merit investigation. To this end, this study focuses on one aspect, model geometry, which is particularly pertinent to fossil material where taphonomic processes often destroy the finer details of anatomy or in models built from clinical CTs where the resolution is limited and anatomical details are lost. We manipulated the details of a finite element (FE) model of an adult human male cranium and examined the impact on model performance. First, using digital speckle interferometry, we directly measured strains from the infraorbital region and frontal process of the maxilla of the physical cranium under simplified loading conditions, simulating incisor biting. These measured strains were then compared with predicted values from FE models with simplified geometries that included modifications to model resolution, and how cancellous bone and the thin bones of the circum-nasal and maxillary regions were represented. Distributions of regions of relatively high and low principal strains and principal strain vector magnitudes and directions, predicted by the most detailed FE model, are generally similar to those achieved invitro. Representing cancellous bone as solid cortical bone lowers strain magnitudes substantially but the mode of deformation of the FE model is relatively constant. In contrast, omitting thin plates of bone in the circum-nasal region affects both mode and magnitude of deformation. Our findings provide a useful frame of reference with regard to the effects of simplifications on the performance of FE models of the cranium and call for caution in the interpretation and comparison of FEA results.

Highlights

  • Finite element analysis (FEA) is increasingly applied in studies of skeletal form and function

  • By comparing the strains predicted by a series of finite element (FE) models of the human cranium with those measured in vitro in the actual specimen, the impacts of different modelling simplifications on predicted deformations were assessed

  • The hypothesis that there are no differences in strains predicted by the FE models and those measured in the cranium was falsified

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Finite element analysis (FEA) is increasingly applied in studies of skeletal form and function. A focus of interest is the craniofacial skeleton where mechanical loading during ontogeny is important in ensuring balanced, normal growth and so, normal adult form and function (Lieberman 1996; Moss 2007; Menegaz et al 2010). The results of an FEA depend on model geometry, material properties, applied loads and kinematic constraints. Full reproduction of these characteristics in a model of a structure like the human cranium is currently extremely difficult. Representation of anatomy is error prone in the case of fossil material, because of taphonomic alteration of bone internal anatomy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call