Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in unexplained chronic cough

Abstract

BackgroundCough is considered chronic when it lasts for >8 weeks. When no medical explanation can be found it is often called unexplained chronic cough (UCC), which may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aimed to assesses the validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-S) in patients with UCC. MethodsSeventy-six consecutively selected patients with UCC replied to: a local questionnaire; the LCQ-S; a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for cough; the Swedish version of the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ-S); and the Chemical Sensitivity Scale for Sensory Hyperreactivity (CSS-SHR). To evaluate the reproducibility of the LCQ-S, the VAS and LCQ-S were answered again after two to four weeks. ResultsSeventy-four patients (17 men) answered the questionnaires at baseline. Concurrent validity for LCQ-S was regarded as moderate with the VAS for cough and HARQ-S. Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha was high for the LCQ-S total score (0.92) and satisfactory for the LCQ-S domains (0.78–0.83). Reliability and reproducibility were analysed in 57 patients (14 men). Intra-class correlation for the LCQ-S total score and domains showed strong reliability (≥0.92), without any significant differences over time. The standard error of measurement and the smallest real difference were 1.26 and 3.49, respectively. The Bland-Altman plot showed no systematic change in the mean values. ConclusionsThe LCQ-S has good validity and reliability and can be used in clinical settings to evaluate HRQOL in Swedish-speaking adult patients with UCC.