Abstract
IntroductionCardioplegic solutions were first developed to preserve heart function during cardiac surgeries and heart transplants but have application in the nonclinical setting. Due to lack of lab space in the vivarium, cardioplegic solution was used to conserve cardiac function for ex-vivo studies performed in a separate building. All studies in this report were conducted with isolated female rabbit hearts (IRHs) via retrograde perfusion using the Langendorff apparatus to investigate if cardioplegia usage affects cardiac function. MethodsCardioplegia was achieved with a hyperkalemia (27 mM KCL) solution kept at 4 °C. Cardiac function was assessed by measuring ECG parameters, left ventricular contractility, and coronary flow under constant perfusion pressure. IRHs were cannulated with Krebs Henseleit buffer (KH) either fresh or after cardioplegic solution storage (C-IRH). Three comparisons were performed with and without cardioplegia; (i) direct side-by side studies of cardiac function; (ii) pharmacological responses to typical ion channels blockers, dofetilide, flecainide, and diltiazem; (iii) retrospective evaluation of cardiac functions in a large sample of hearts. ResultsIn the side-by-side comparisons, cardioplegia-stored IRHs (C-IRH; storage time 90 min) had similar electrocardiographic (ECG) and hemodynamic parameters to fresh-cannulated hearts with KH buffer (KH-IRH). In addition, responses to dofetilide, flecainide, and diltiazem, were similar for C-IRH and KH-IRH hearts. Over the years (2006–2011), baseline data was collected from 79 hearts without cardioplegia and 100 hearts with cardioplegia (C-IRH; storage time 15 min), which showed no meaningful differences in a retrospective analysis. DiscussionCardiac function was preserved after cardioplegic treatment, however, coronary flow rates were decreased (−19.3%) in C-IRH hearts which indicated an altered coronary vascular tone. In conclusion, storage in cardioplegic solution preserves rabbit cardiac function, a practice that enables heart tissues to be collected at one site (e.g., vivarium) and transported to a laboratory in a separate location.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.