Abstract

BackgroundTelemedicine has changed the landscape of patient care with wider use of patient-centered outcome measures (PCOMs). We evaluated two novel task–based PCOMs namely ten times arm lift (AL) test and two-minute walk distance (2MWD) in idiopathic myositis (IIM).MethodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study with the enrolment of adult IIM (ACR/EULAR criteria) patients with active/inactive disease. Active disease was defined as any two of increase in immunosuppression within 3 months, elevated muscle enzymes, physician VAS ≥ 2, worsened cutaneous disease, or fall in MMT8 < 76. Standard myositis core set measures (CSMs) were evaluated and test–retest validity [Cronbach’s alfa (CA)], construct validity (Pearson’s correlation), and discriminant validity (between active/inactive IIM) were assessed. The results were further validated in a separate tele-rheumatology cohort.ResultsAmong 22 IIM patients (68%-female) of age 30.5(19–62) years, AL and 2MWD showed excellent test–retest reliability (CA-0.987, 0.99). AL exhibited moderate-strong correlation with all CSMs except CK levels and MDI. In contrast, 2MWD values were highly variable without CSM correlation. A higher AL time discriminated active and inactive myositis (16.6 vs 11 s, p = 0.006) with an AUC of 0.882 (p = 0.006). AL > 12.8 s had 94% negative predictive value (NPV) for active muscle disease. In the validation cohort (47 patient visits among 26 patients), AL significantly differentiated between active vs. inactive disease with an NPV of 95%.ConclusionsAL test exhibits pilot evidence of construct and discriminant validity in patients with IIM requiring further evaluation. 2MWD was not a good test for outcome evaluation of IIM patients. Key Points• Novel task–based patient-centered outcome measures were evaluated for remote monitoring of muscle strength in IIM.• Ten times arm lift (AL) test showed strong test–retest reliability as well as provide pilot evidence of construct and discriminant validity in patients with IIM unlike 2-min walk distance.• This provides preliminary evidence to further evaluate the role of AL as patient-centered outcome measure in patients with IIM for virtual clinical trials.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-021-05990-3.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call