Abstract

This study aims to i) evaluate two triple-wash procedures with an H2O2-peroxyacetic-acid mixer (SaniDate-5.0) to improve microbial safety and quality of butternut squashes and ii) determine the feasibility of the triple-wash application in a processing plant. In study I, fresh squashes were dip-inoculated with a mixture of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes, followed by two triple-wash steps including water dip-antimicrobial dip-water dip (WAW) or water dip-water dip-antimicrobial dip (WWA). Tested antimicrobials were i) lactic/citric acid blend (LCA; 2.5%); ii) sodium hypochlorite (SH; 100 ppm); and iii) SaniDate-5.0, 0.0064, 0.25 and 0.50%. Surviving bacteria were recovered using XLT-4 agar for Salmonella and MOX agar for L. monocytogenes. In study II, freshly harvested squashes were either left unwashed or triple-washed using WWA in water and SaniDate-5.0 (0.0071 and 0.45%) at a processing plant followed by storage at 9 °C for 70 days. Aerobic Plate Counts (APCs), coliforms/Escherichia coli, lactic-acid-bacteria, and psychrotrophs on squashes were tested every seven days. Counts of Salmonella and L. monocytogenes on unwashed squash were 5.0–5.3 and 5.4–6.0 log CFU/squash, respectively. WWA wash was more effective (P < 0.05) in reducing Salmonella (2.5 log CFU/squash) and L. monocytogenes (2.3 log CFU/squash) than WAW (1.8 log CFU/squash for Salmonella and 0.3 log CFU/squash for L. monocytogenes). Antimicrobials caused different degrees in reduction of Salmonella (1.7–2.6 log CFU/squash) and L. monocytogenes (1.2–1.8 log CFU/squash) on squashes, while the highest was achieved with SantiDate-5.0 (0.25 or 0.5%). During storage, SaniDate-5.0 treated squashes showed lower (P < 0.05) counts of APCs, coliforms, lactic-acid-bacteria, and psychrotrophs than the unwashed and water-treated samples on days 50–70. The estimated annual operating cost of the triple-wash process with SaniDate-5.0 ranges from $487.05 to $1977.33 for growers producing 1000–5000 squashes. The WWA procedure with SaniDate-5.0 appears to be an economically feasible way for local small producers to improve microbial safety and quality of squashes during postharvest processing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.