Validation of the time to attain maximal clot amplitude after reaching maximal clot formation velocity parameter as a measure of fibrinolysis using rotational thromboelastometry and its application in the assessment of fibrinolytic resistance in septic patients: a prospective observational study: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Fibrinolysis

Abstract

BackgroundIn sepsis, fibrinolysis resistance correlates with worse outcomes. Practically, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is used to report residual clot amplitude relative to maximum amplitude at specified times after clot formation clot lysis indices (CLIs). However, healthy individuals can exhibit similar CLIs, thus making it challenging to solely diagnose the low fibrinolytic state. Furthermore, CLI does not include the kinetics of clot formation, which can affect overall fibrinolysis. Therefore, a more nuanced analysis, such as time to attain maximal clot amplitude after reaching maximal clot formation velocity (t-AUCi), is needed to better identify fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis. ObjectivesTo evaluate the correlation between the degree of fibrinolytic activation and t-AUCi in healthy or septic individuals. MethodsWhole blood (n = 60) from septic or healthy donors was analyzed using tissue factor–activated (EXTEM) and nonactivated (NATEM) ROTEM assays. Lysis was initiated with tissue-type plasminogen activator, and CLI and t-AUCi were calculated. Standard coagulation tests and plasma fibrinolysis markers (D-dimer, plasmin-α2-antiplasmin complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1, and plasminogen) were also measured. Resultst-AUCi values decreased with increasing fibrinolytic activity and correlated positively with CLI for different degrees of clot lysis both in EXTEM and NATEM. t-AUCi cutoff value of 1962.0 seconds in EXTEM predicted low fibrinolytic activity with 81.8% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity. In addition, t-AUCi is not influenced by clot retraction. ConclusionWhole-blood point-of-care ROTEM analyses with t-AUCi offers a more rapid and parametric evaluation of fibrinolytic potential compared with CLI, which can be used for a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis.