Abstract

The name Endobeuthos paleosum, previously published in this journal, was invalid due to the lack of a designation of one of the illustrations as the holotype specimen and the others as paratypes. This oversight is here corrected and the taxon name properly validated.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call