Abstract

The Multiple Source Method (MSM) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method are used to estimate usual dietary intake from short-term dietary assessment instruments, such as 24 hour dietary recall (24-HRs). However, their performance has not been validated in the Chinese population via nutrition surveys. To validate the accuracy of the MSM and NCI method in estimating usual dietary intake in the Chinese population, 752 individuals from northern and southern China answered four seasons of seven consecutive 24-HRs (one for each season). The true usual dietary intake was considered as the average of the 28 collection days of dietary component intake. Using data sets with consecutive 3 collection days, the usual intakes of the selected dietary components were estimated by MSM, NCI and the within-person mean of three 24-HRs (3 day method). These estimates were compared with the true usual intake at the group and individual level. At the group level, the MSM and NCI method performed similarly, yielding estimates closer to the true usual intake than 3 day method. The percentage differences of the estimates for dietary components not consumed daily from the MSM and NCI method were larger than for the dietary components consumed daily. However, the larger percentage differences were observed in the tail of the usual intake distribution. In general, dietary components with larger variance ratios had greater percentage differences. At the individual level, for overall seasons and dietary components, the biases of individual usual intake did agree for MSM and NCI method, whereas NCI method estimates were closer to true intakes than for the MSM and 3 day method. Similar results were observed in the relative biases of dietary components consumed daily. As with the group level, there was less percentage difference in dietary components consumed daily. Both the MSM and NCI method can be used to estimate usual intake in Chinese populations and are closer to the true usual intake than the traditional mean method, at both group and individual levels.

Highlights

  • For overall seasons and dietary components, the biases of individual usual intake did agree for Multiple Source Method (MSM) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) method, whereas NCI method estimates were closer to true intakes than for the MSM and 3 day method

  • Survey sites were selected based on the level and experience of investigators assigned to the sites, and those who participated in the China Adult Chronic Disease and Nutrition Surveillance in 2015 (CACDNS 2015)

  • This study compared and validated two innovative statistical methods and traditional mean method to estimate the usual intake of dietary components at population and individual levels from three consecutive 24-HRs in a sample of adults aged 18 to 60 years living in China

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Usual dietary intake, defined as the average long term dietary intake of an individual, is the exposure of interest when studying the relationship between chronic diseases and diet and is a factor of evaluation when determining the prevalence of inadequate or excessive dietary intakes [1]. There are many dietary assessment instruments such as 24 hour dietary recall (24-HRs), weighed diet records and Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) [2,3,4]. Because of its simplicity and relative accuracy, 24-HRs is a common method for many large nutritional epidemiological surveys and nutritional status surveillances [5,6,7]. The average of a sufficient number of 24-HRs is a similar estimation of usual dietary intake [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call