Abstract

The Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) on board the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-R (GOES-R) series enables retrieval of aerosol optical depth (AOD) every 5 min. However, the current version of the official GOES-16 ABI AOD product is affected by diurnally varying biases. An improved ABI AOD product based on an empirical bias correction algorithm has become available recently. This study aims to comprehensively validate this improved ABI AOD product over land and ocean. Three years of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) ground-based measurements at 95 stations over North America are used for the validation. Results suggest the product performs moderately well with an overall R2 of 0.46, an MBE of 0.04, a slope of 0.97, and ∼70.0% retrievals falling within the expected error (EE) envelope. A slight overestimation is found at a majority of ground sites: ≈87% of those sites have MBE values between 0 and 0.1. The analysis shows that the retrievals perform better over water and forests, but perform poorly over urban areas, grasslands and shrublands, and is worst over mountains. Besides, the present results indicate that the combination of the retrieval and bias correction algorithms yields a systematic underestimation of AOD for coarse particles over croplands, as well as large uncertainties for smaller-size particles over shrublands. At seasonal scale, the AOD retrievals perform better in summer and autumn than in spring and winter. Despite the empirical bias correction algorithm, a systematic overestimation of 0.07 at 1700 UTC and 0.08 during 1000–1300 UTC still exist. The sampling rate of the top-2 quality AOD retrievals are 14%, 12%, 10% and 11% for the four seasons, respectively, which constitutes a significant reduction of valid data in comparison with the sampling rate of all four quality retrievals. The limited availability and accuracy of the top-2 bias-corrected ABI AOD product raises concerns about its application in air quality and energy-related applications, in particular. This study also suggests a few potential improvements to the aerosol retrieval algorithm.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.