Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being.

Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra,Peter M Ten Klooster,Ernst T Bohlmeijer,Constance H C Drossaert,Marcel E Pieterse,Linda Bolier,Jan A Walburg

doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5

Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra, Peter M Ten Klooster + Show 5 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5

Copy DOI

Journal: BMC psychology	Publication Date: Mar 17, 2016
Citations: 95	License type: cc-by

Affiliation: University of Twente, Trimbos Institute

Abstract

BackgroundThere is growing interest in measuring the eudaimonic perspective of mental well-being (social and psychological well-being) alongside existing measures of the hedonic perspective of mental well-being (subjective well-being). The Flourishing Scale (FS) assesses core aspects of social-psychological functioning and is now widely used in research in practice. However, the reliability and validity of eudaimonic measures such as the FS has not yet been tested in people with low or moderate levels of well-being. This group is at risk for developing mental disorders and, therefore, an important target group for public mental health.MethodsWe extensively evaluated the psychometric properties of the 8-item FS in a sample of adults with low or moderate levels of well-being in The Netherlands (N = 275) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), item response theory analysis and a multitrait matrix.ResultsThe unidimensional structure of the scale was confirmed with CFA and an adequate fit to the Rasch model. However, our sample showed positive skewness of the scale, but lacked measurement precision at the higher end of the social-psychological continuum. In general, the multitrait matrix demonstrated the convergent validity of the scale, with strong to weak correlations between the FS and (1) overall well-being, (2) social and psychological well-being (3) positive eudaimonic states, (4) hedonic states, (5) psychopathology and (6) personality traits. Nevertheless, relatively low correlations were found, specifically in comparison with the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).ConclusionsThe FS seems a reliable and valid instrument for measuring social-psychological functioning in adults with suboptimal well-being, but its use in intervention studies and clinical practice might be debatable. Therefore, the FS seems most suitable to include in epidemiological studies alongside existing hedonic measures to more fully capture mental well-being. Future research should examine the temporal stability of the FS and the consequences of the positive skewness and limited external validity of the scale found in the current study.

Highlights

There is growing interest in measuring the eudaimonic perspective of mental well-being alongside existing measures of the hedonic perspective of mental well-being
Whereas the hedonic perspective refers to the affective or ‘feeling good’ dimension of well-being [1] the eudaimonic perspective refers to the psychological functioning or ‘living well’ dimension of well-being [2, 3]
There were no floor or ceiling effects since no participants scored either 8 or 56. These descriptive and distribution statistics suggest that the majority of our sample perceived themselves positively on the main aspects of socialpsychological functioning

Summary

Introduction

There is growing interest in measuring the eudaimonic perspective of mental well-being (social and psychological well-being) alongside existing measures of the hedonic perspective of mental well-being (subjective well-being). Most (socioeconomic) research has been conducted on the hedonic perspective with the use of single-item or brief subjective well-being measures such as the Satisfaction with Life Scale [4], the Subjective Happiness Scale [5] and the Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale [6] While these measures are firmly rooted in research and practice, the availability and use of measures to capture the social and psychological well-being dimensions lags behind. Keyes [2] identified five core dimensions of social well-being (social acceptance, social actualization, social contribution, social coherence and social integration) originating from sociological and social psychological theories These social and psychological core aspects of well-being are united in the comprehensive Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) which measures hedonic (subjective) well-being [7, 8]. Diener et al [11] have recently developed the brief and comprehensive Flourishing Scale (FS) based on humanistic and eudaimonic wellbeing theories

Results

Discussion

Conclusion