Abstract

BackgroundCentrally collected Finnish national health register data on adverse pregnancy outcomes are available for research, but the validity of the data is largely unknown. Our aim was to compare the diagnoses of preeclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes (GDM), and preterm delivery from hospital records with the registry based diagnoses from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care (FCR). Data on gestational age at delivery from the Medical Birth Registry (MBR) was also studied. MethodsThe Finnish Genetics of Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) Study cohort was used as a data source. Each diagnosis was ascertained from electronic hospital records. The validity of diagnoses obtained by record linkage of FCR and MBR was assessed against the classification previously confirmed independently by a research nurse and a study physician. ResultsSensitivity of PE diagnoses in FCR was 80.3 % (95 % CI 78.3 % to 82.2 %) andspecificity 95.3 % (95 % CI 93.9 % to 96.4 %). Sensitivity for GDM was 64.1 % (95 % CI: 58.7 % − 69.3 %) and specificity 98.5 % (95 % CI: 97.9 % − 98.9 %), whereas sensitivity and specificity for preterm delivery were 32.4 % (95 % CI: 29.0 % − 36.0 %) and 99.7 % (95 % CI: 99.3 % − 99.9 %). Sensitivity of preterm delivery in the MBR was 99.1 % and specificity 99.9 %. ConclusionsFCR registry diagnoses for PE have satisfactory sensitivity and high specificity. Diagnoses for GDM and preterm delivery have lower sensitivity limiting their use in studies, and data from MBR should be preferred when studying preterm deliveries.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call