Abstract

BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to measure patient’s perspective of functional well-being, disease burden, treatment effectiveness, and clinical decision making. Electronic versions are increasingly feasible because of smartphone and tablet usage. However, validation of these electronic PROMs (ePROMs) is warranted for justified implementation. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) 5 and 15 are widely used PROMs in urology to measure erectile dysfunction. Measurement reliability and validity testing of the IIEF ePROMs are essential before clinical application.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess reliability and validity of an ePROM version of both IIEF-5 and 15.MethodsThis study included 179 patients from our urology outpatient clinic. It also had a randomized crossover design—participants completed either a paper and electronic IIEF-5 or 15 or twice completed an electronic version—with a 5-day delay. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient, test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and convergent validity using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient.ResultsA total of 122 participants completed the study. Internal consistency was excellent for the electronic IIEF-5 (ICC 0.902) and good to excellent for the domains of the IIEF-15 (ICC 0.962-0.834). Test-retest reliability was excellent for the IIEF-5 (ICC 0.924) and good to excellent for the domains of the IIEF-15 (ICC 0.950-0.778). Convergent validity was excellent for the IIEF-5 and IIEF-15, with a correlation of r=0.923 and r=0.951, respectively.ConclusionsWe successfully introduced patient-acceptable ePROM versions of the IIEF-5 and IIEF-15. This study’s results demonstrate that the ePROM versions of the IIEF-5 and IIEF-15 can be reliably implemented, as outcomes are reliable and in accordance with findings of the paper version.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03222388; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03222388

Highlights

  • The International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), widely used in urology to measure erectile dysfunction (ED), applied both in clinical research and in daily clinical practice [1]

  • Internal consistency was excellent for the electronic Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 (ICC 0.902) and good to excellent for the domains of the IIEF-15 (ICC 0.962-0.834)

  • Test-retest reliability was excellent for the IIEF-5 (ICC 0.924) and good to excellent for the domains of the IIEF-15 (ICC 0.950-0.778)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background The International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), widely used in urology to measure erectile dysfunction (ED), applied both in clinical research and in daily clinical practice [1]. Simple digitalization of existing PROMs does not assure reliability of ePROMs as administration, and subsequently outcomes, may be altered [6,8]. Given the fact that smartphone- and tablet-feasible ePROM versions of the IIEF-5 and 15 will probably include layout changes, reliability and validity testing of the IIEFs is needed to assure outcome quality. Electronic versions are increasingly feasible because of smartphone and tablet usage. Validation of these electronic PROMs (ePROMs) is warranted for justified implementation. Measurement reliability and validity testing of the IIEF ePROMs are essential before clinical application

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.