Abstract
Three studies are presented as supportive validatory evidence for the Delusions‐Symptoms‐States Inventory (DSSI). Firstly, senior psychologists and psychiatrists were asked to allocate the 84 DSSI items to clinical syndromes. For 17 items the assignment did not correspond to that of the authors, e.g. ‘neurotic depression’ items alloted to ‘psychotic depression’. Secondly, further referees had to put these 17 items into the DSSI sets, e.g. state of anxiety. This was done as predicted in all but two cases. The third study used clinicians of varied experience to rate their patients according to the presence of the syndromes. These ratings broadly agreed with the patients' scores on the DSSI sets, and for nine of the twelve the association was statistically significant.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
