Abstract
Regulatory agencies addressing human risk assessment of new pharmaceuticals, pesticides, food additives, cosmetics, and other chemicals currently require submission of a large battery of in vivo toxicity data derived from tests utilizing laboratory animals. Although fairly well proven for evaluating toxicity, the use of laboratory animals may have limited predictive values for human risk assessment because of differences in factors, such as bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, receptor sensitivity, and repair mechanisms. The use of cell cultures for measuring drug toxicity is becoming increasingly acceptable. Accordingly, in vitro toxicity tests have been in demand and numerous organizations (e.g., Fund for Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments [FRAME], European Research Group for Alternate Testing [ERGAT], Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing [CAAT], and the International Multi-Center Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity [MEIC]) are encouraging the development of alternative testing protocols.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.