Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of AI/RHEUM, an experimental expert system for support in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, was assessed using a collection of data in a cohort of 1,570 consecutive outpatients of a Dutch rheumatological clinic. Computer diagnoses based on these data and diagnostic predictions made by rheumatologists were compared with reference diagnoses that had been obtained by consensus of rheumatologists after 6-12 months follow-up. Performance of the tested version of the AI/RHEUM knowledge base is presented by various methods. Sensitivity varied between 29% and 100% for different rheumatological diseases. Average sensitivity and specificity for all 26 diagnoses present in the knowledge base were 67% and 98%, respectively. Performance according to the level of confidence indicated that 78% of the "definite", 65% of the "probable", and 33% of the "possible" conclusions made by AI/RHEUM were in agreement with the reference diagnoses. These results approximated the predictions made by rheumatologists after a single, initial examination. The system was less accurate than it had appeared in previous evaluation studies with complex clinical cases. The AI/RHEUM knowledge base needed refining to diagnose early rheumatic complaints. This study further illustrates the need for objective and informative parameters for expressing accuracy of diagnostic support systems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.