Abstract

Manual scoring of polysomnography data is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and most existing software does not account for subjective differences and user variability. Therefore, we evaluated a supervised machine learning algorithm, SomnivoreTM, for automated wake–sleep stage classification. We designed an algorithm that extracts features from various input channels, following a brief session of manual scoring, and provides automated wake-sleep stage classification for each recording. For algorithm validation, polysomnography data was obtained from independent laboratories, and include normal, cognitively-impaired, and alcohol-treated human subjects (total n = 52), narcoleptic mice and drug-treated rats (total n = 56), and pigeons (n = 5). Training and testing sets for validation were previously scored manually by 1–2 trained sleep technologists from each laboratory. F-measure was used to assess precision and sensitivity for statistical analysis of classifier output and human scorer agreement. The algorithm gave high concordance with manual visual scoring across all human data (wake 0.91 ± 0.01; N1 0.57 ± 0.01; N2 0.81 ± 0.01; N3 0.86 ± 0.01; REM 0.87 ± 0.01), which was comparable to manual inter-scorer agreement on all stages. Similarly, high concordance was observed across all rodent (wake 0.95 ± 0.01; NREM 0.94 ± 0.01; REM 0.91 ± 0.01) and pigeon (wake 0.96 ± 0.006; NREM 0.97 ± 0.01; REM 0.86 ± 0.02) data. Effects of classifier learning from single signal inputs, simple stage reclassification, automated removal of transition epochs, and training set size were also examined. In summary, we have developed a polysomnography analysis program for automated sleep-stage classification of data from diverse species. Somnivore enables flexible, accurate, and high-throughput analysis of experimental and clinical sleep studies.

Highlights

  • Sleep is one of the most critical physiological processes for all species with a nervous system, ranging from jellyfish and flatworms (Lesku and Ly, 2017; Omond et al, 2017) to complex mammals

  • Data were collected using Compumedics hardware (Siesta) and software (Profusion PSG3) (Compumedics Ltd., Abbotsford, VIC, Australia), and manually scored in 30 s epochs according to AASM criteria, by two experienced scorers from the Sleep Laboratory at the University of Melbourne, both blinded to the experimental conditions

  • Manual Versus Algorithmic Inter-Scorer Agreement The University of Melbourne Human (UMH) cohort data was manually scored by two researchers, so agreement between hypnograms manually scored by scorer 1 or 2 (MS1; MS2) versus algorithmic hypnograms automatically scored using training data drawn from manual scoring of scorer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sleep is one of the most critical physiological processes for all species with a nervous system, ranging from jellyfish and flatworms (Lesku and Ly, 2017; Omond et al, 2017) to complex mammals. Basic and clinical research on sleep has lagged, as the complex dynamics of sleep make it difficult to study. Sleep stage scoring remains generally slow, laborious and tedious, and it can be highly subjective. It is the primary bottleneck preventing the sleep research field from flourishing, in light of rapid improvements in polysomnography-related hardware and the emergence of Big Data

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call