Validation of single item Linear Analogue Scale Assessments (LASAs) for assessing quality of life (QOL) in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas

Abstract

8583 Background: Patient QOL assessment requires balancing the detail provided by multi-item assessments with the reduced burden of single-item assessments. We investigated the psychometric properties of single-item LASA assessments used in 3 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II trials for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. Methods: Measures included QOL LASAs (overall, physical, emotional, spiritual, intellectual), Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy (FACT; overall, physical, emotional). Association of LASA measures with SDS, POMS, and FACT domains and with ECOG performance score (PS) and MMSE was assessed with Spearman’s correlation. Repeated measures ANOVA models compared the change over time of LASAs and SDS, POMS, and FACT. Cox regression modeled the association of baseline QOL and survival. Results: 205 patients completed the QOL assessments across 3 time points. LASA mean scores ranged from 60–78; SDS, POMS, and FACT ranged from 68–81. No significant changes across time for overall and emotional scores were observed. FACT physical decreased over time (p<0.001) as did LASA physical (p=0.08). LASA scales were strongly associated with corresponding scales on SDS, POMS, and FACT (0.44<rho<0.65; p<0.001). LASA was negatively associated with PS and positively with MMSE. Baseline scores for overall FACT (p=0.005) and LASA physical (p=0.015) were associated with better survival. Conclusions: The single-item LASA assessments have comparable psychometric properties as longer assessments for the same constructs. Correlations with PS and MMSE were as expected (convergent/concurrent validity). The discriminant validity and prognostic ability of LASA items were similar to the multi-item instruments. Collectively, the data suggest that the single item LASA scales are valid for assessing QOL in patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas and are an appropriate alternative when a shorter instrument is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.