Abstract
The Pathfinder respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Kallestad), the shell vial (SV) technique, and conventional cell culture (CC) were compared for detection of RSV in nasopharyngeal aspirates. We found sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of 58.4, 100, 100, and 68.2%; 80.7, 97.2, 97.0, and 81.9%; and 77.6, 97.2, 96.9, and 79.5% for the CC, EIA, and SV methods, respectively. The SV and EIA techniques were both more sensitive than CC (P < 0.001). Finally, 29 respiratory viruses other than RSV were identified by CC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
