Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of differently calculated quantitative scores from motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS).Methods: Twenty patients with PPMS had MEP to upper and lower limbs at baseline, years 1 and 2 measured in addition to clinical assessment [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), ambulation score]; a subsample (n = 9) had a nine-hole peg test (NHPT) and a timed 25-foot walk (T25FW). Quantitative MEP scores for upper limbs (qMEP-UL), lower limbs (qMEP-LL), and all limbs (qMEP) were calculated in three different ways, based on z-transformed central motor conduction time (CMCT), shortest corticomuscular latency (CxM-sh), and mean CxM (CxM-mn). Changes in clinical measures and qMEP metrics were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (rANOVA), and a factor analysis was performed on change in qMEP metrics.Results: Expanded Disability Status Scale and ambulation score progressed in the rANOVA model (p < 0.05; post-hoc comparison baseline–year 2, p < 0.1). Lower limb and combined qMEP scores showed significant deterioration of latency (p < 0.01, MEP-LL_CxM-sh: p < 0.05) and in post-hoc comparisons (baseline–year 2, p < 0.05), qMEP_CxM-mn even over 1 year (p < 0.05). Effect sizes were higher for qMEP scores than for clinical measures, and slightly but consistently higher when based on CxM-mn compared to CxM-sh or CMCT. Subgroup analysis yielded no indication of higher sensitivity of timed clinical measures over qMEP scores. Two independent factors were detected, the first mainly associated with qMEP-LL, the second with qMEP-UL, explaining 65 and 29% of total variability, respectively.Conclusions: Deterioration in qMEP scores occurs earlier than EDSS progression in patients with PPMS. Upper and lower limb qMEP scores contribute independently to measuring change, and qMEP scores based on mean CxM are advantageous. The capability to detect subclinical changes longitudinally is a unique property of EP and complementary to clinical assessment. These features underline the role of EP as candidate biomarkers to measure effects of therapeutic interventions in PPMS.
Highlights
Development of therapies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is hampered by the fact that detecting disease progression by clinical assessment needs considerable sample sizes and follow-up time to be meaningful [1, 2]
Effect sizes were higher in qMEP-LL and combined qMEP scores than in clinical assessments, and highest in scores based on CxM_mn
We found no evidence indicating that nine-hole peg test (NHPT) or timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) was superior to qMEP scores
Summary
Development of therapies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is hampered by the fact that detecting disease progression by clinical assessment needs considerable sample sizes and follow-up time to be meaningful [1, 2]. Evoked potentials yield complementary information to clinical assessment as they are closely related to demyelination and measure subclinical changes, which may transform only later into clinical disability. Several clinical studies have reported that scores from multimodal EP are predictive of disease course in relapsing and progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) [review in [9]], and short-term test–retest variability is reasonably low for quantitative EP scores (qEPS) [10]. A multimodal qEPS deteriorated after 6 months, whereas the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) became significantly worse only after 12 months [11]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.