Abstract

Available rawinsonde, automatic weather station (AWS), ship, and synthesized long‐term observations are used to evaluate the Antarctic numerical analyses of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) from 1985 to 1994. Twice‐daily variations in the ECMWF surface pressure analyses compare closely with AWS units of the U.S. Antarctic Program and ship observations. The NCEP analyses over the same period show substantial improvement, particularly during the period 1985–1990. Surface air temperatures and winds do not agree so closely, which may result from analyses error, the localized nature of the fields, or a combination. Validation of the analyses standard pressure level fields using available rawinsonde data reveal a general long‐term decrease in RMS errors with time for both analyses. RMS errors in NCEP 200 hPa geopotential heights of over 200 geopotential meters (gpm) for central plateau stations are evident only prior to May 1986. However, a significant upward trend from 1989 to 1993 in geopotential height RMS differences is apparent at several levels. The ECMWF analyses are generally found to be superior and offer a reasonable depiction of the broadscale atmospheric circulation; however, deficiencies in midtropospheric temperatures and lower tropospheric winds are evident. Comparisons of ship data from individual cruises of the S.A. Agulhas and the R/V Nathaniel B. Palmer to the numerical analyses reveal substantial agreement for pressure and temperature variables. Observations from the Nathaniel B. Palmer in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen Seas were not available to the weather forecasting centers. Results presented here indicate that a large amount of the available data is being incorporated and that large deficiencies identified in previous studies are being addressed, although areas of concern remain. Deficiencies in comparisons to specific stations are common to both analyses, implying continued communications problems. In particular, grid values corresponding to individual stations including the now‐closed Leningradskaya base and Mirnyy are found to be conspicuously deficient at the 200 hPa level for both analyses.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.