Abstract

Crystallographic studies of ligands bound to biological macromolecules (proteins and nucleic acids) play a crucial role in structure-guided drug discovery and design, and also provide atomic level insights into the physical chemistry of complex formation between macromolecules and ligands. The quality with which small-molecule ligands have been modelled in Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries has been, and continues to be, a matter of concern for many investigators. Correctly interpreting whether electron density found in a binding site is compatible with the soaked or co-crystallized ligand or represents water or buffer molecules is often far from trivial. The Worldwide PDB validation report (VR) provides a mechanism to highlight any major issues concerning the quality of the data and the model at the time of deposition and annotation, so the depositors can fix issues, resulting in improved data quality. The ligand-validation methods used in the generation of the current VRs are described in detail, including an examination of the metrics to assess both geometry and electron-density fit. It is found that the LLDF score currently used to identify ligand electron-density fit outliers can give misleading results and that better ligand-validation metrics are required.

Highlights

  • The quality of small-molecule ligands in Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries has been, and continues to be, a matter of concern for many investigators (Kleywegt & Jones, 1998; Kleywegt et al, 2003; Kleywegt, 2007; Davis et al, 2008; Liebeschuetz et al, 2012; Pozharski et al, 2013; Smart & Bricogne, 2015; Deller & Rupp, 2015)

  • This paper investigates how the ligand-validation procedures and metrics currently included in the validation report (VR) work in practice for structures determined by X-ray crystallography

  • The reports attempt to help with the assessment of electron density for bound molecules and the electron-density model fit quality by providing the Local ligand density fit (LLDF), Real-space correlation coefficient (RSCC) and Real-space R value (RSR) metrics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The quality of small-molecule ligands in Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries has been, and continues to be, a matter of concern for many investigators (Kleywegt & Jones, 1998; Kleywegt et al, 2003; Kleywegt, 2007; Davis et al, 2008; Liebeschuetz et al, 2012; Pozharski et al, 2013; Smart & Bricogne, 2015; Deller & Rupp, 2015). Interpreting whether electron density observed in a binding site is compatible with the soaked ligand or represents water or buffer molecules is sometimes far from trivial. It is challenging when ligands are relatively small or bind with only partial occupancy (Pearce et al, 2017). D74, 228–236 research papers discovery (Scapin et al, 2015) This makes it important to establish dependable metrics that can be used to assess whether a ligand modelled with a macromolecular structure can be relied upon. This paper investigates how the ligand-validation procedures and metrics currently included in the VR work in practice for structures determined by X-ray crystallography

Methods
Validation of ligand geometric features
Assessing ligand fit to electron density
Discussion and conclusions
Findings
Funding information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call