Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to validate a method to prepare simulated small intestinal fluid (SSIF) for in vitro digestion in ducks. Experiment 1 compared the in vitro digestible energy (IVDE) of SSIF to endogenous small intestinal fluid (ESIF) on four feeds. The ESIF 1 or 2 obtained from two groups of jejunal cannulated ducks offered diet 1 (3,050kcal/kg of ME and 19.95% of CP) or 2 (2,801kcal/kg of ME and 14.90% of CP) was purified into raw enzyme power (REP) 1 or 2. SSIF 1 to 3 or 4 to 6 were prepared to mimic ESIF 1 or 2, respectively. The enzyme sources were REP 1 for SSIF 1 and 4, REP 2 for SSIF 2 and 5 or reagent enzymes for SSIF 3 and 6, respectively. The IVDE of each feed was determined with SSIF or ESIF. Experiment 2 was to validate whether REP 1 was more effective than only reagent enzymes to prepare SSIF. Ten feeds were determined with pepsin following SSIF 1 or 3 for IVDE 1 or 2, respectively. The accuracy of prediction model of true metabolizable energy (TME) from IVDE 1 or 2 was evaluated to validate the efficacy of SSIF. In experiment 1, higher activities of amylase, trypsin and chymotrypsin were observed in ESIF 1 than ESIF 2 (P < 0.05). The IVDE determined with SSIF 1 and 2 or 3 and 4 were more comparable to that of ESIF 1 or 2 than determinations with SSIF 3 or 6. In experiment 2, the mean IVDE 1 or 2 was 97.22% or 96.23% relative to TME, respectively, and both were highly correlated with TME (P < 0.01; R2 ≥ 0.98). However, the residual SD of TME prediction model with IVDE 1 was less than that generated with IVDE 2 (55vs. 71kcal/kg). In conclusion, the IVDE determined with in vitro digestion of pepsin following SSIF prepared with REP can predict accurately TME of feed for ducks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call