Abstract

Deviceless four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) allows the acquisition of respiratory signals from six features without requiring an external device for cine CT processing. This method has been recently introduced in radiation treatment planning of lung tumors. To validate deviceless 4D CT, it must be compared with conventional 4D CT, which requires an external monitoring device. We compared the two methods using a multicell 4D phantom that simulates patient’s movement during respiration regarding the target volume (TV), target position (TP), and internal TV for lung tumor radiation therapy. We retrospectively obtained images of 10 patients who underwent radiation treatment planning of lung tumors and compared the two methods, as in the phantom study. For the phantom study, the mean TV, root mean square errors of the TP, and mean internal TV differences between the two methods ranged from −4.5% to 1.2%, 0.7 to 2.6 mm, and −1.1% to 3.4%, respectively. The corresponding results of the clinical study ranged from −1.5% to 14.9%, 0.1 to 5.9 mm, and −9.7% to 10.1%, respectively. The results of deviceless 4D CT for the clinical study were consistent with those of conventional 4D CT, except for target movements with high excursions. Therefore, deviceless 4D CT can be an alternative to conventional 4D CT for radiation treatment planning of lung tumors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call