Abstract

Objective. Proton therapy allows for highly conformal dose deposition, but is sensitive to range uncertainties. Several approaches currently under development measure composition-dependent secondary radiation to monitor the delivered proton range in-vivo. To fully utilize these methods, an estimate of the elemental composition of the patient’s tissue is often needed. Approach. A published dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based composition-extraction algorithm was validated against reference compositions obtained with two independent methods. For this purpose, a set of phantoms containing either fresh porcine tissue or tissue-mimicking samples with known, realistic compositions were imaged with a CT scanner at two different energies. Then, the prompt gamma-ray (PG) signal during proton irradiation was measured with a PG detector prototype. The PG workflow used pre-calculated Monte Carlo simulations to obtain an optimized estimate of the sample’s carbon and oxygen contents. The compositions were also assessed with chemical combustion analysis (CCA), and the stopping-power ratio (SPR) was measured with a multi-layer ionization chamber. The DECT images were used to calculate SPR-, density- and elemental composition maps, and to assign voxel-wise compositions from a selection of human tissues. For a more comprehensive set of reference compositions, the original selection was extended by 135 additional tissues, corresponding to spongiosa, high-density bones and low-density tissues. Results. The root-mean-square error for the soft tissue carbon and oxygen content was 8.5 wt% and 9.5 wt% relative to the CCA result and 2.1 wt% and 10.3 wt% relative to the PG result. The phosphorous and calcium content were predicted within 0.4 wt% and 1.1 wt% of the CCA results, respectively. The largest discrepancies were encountered in samples whose composition deviated the most from tabulated compositions or that were more inhomogeneous. Significance. Overall, DECT-based composition estimations of relevant elements were in equal or better agreement with the ground truth than the established SECT-approach and could contribute to in-vivo dose verification measurements.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.