Abstract

Safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws remains a critical step in open and minimally invasive spine surgery. The diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) technique may offer the possibility of intra-operative guidance for pedicle screw placement. Currently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most accurate techniques used to measure fat concentration in tissues. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of fat content measured invasively in vertebrae using DRS and validate it against the Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) derived via MRI. Chemical shift-encoding-based water-fat imaging of the spine was first performed on six cadavers. PDFF images were computed and manually segmented. 23 insertions using a custom-made screw probe with integrated optical fibers were then performed under cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). DR spectra were recorded at several positions along the trajectory as the optical screw probe was inserted turn by turn into the vertebral body. Fat fractions determined via DRS and MRI techniques were compared by spatially correlating the optical screw probe position within the vertebrae on CBCT images with respect to the PDFF images. The fat fraction determined by DRS was found to have a high correlation with those determined by MRI, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.950 (P< 0.001) as compared with PDFF measurements calculated from the MRI technique. Additionally, the two techniques were found to be comparable for fat fraction quantification within vertebral bodies (R2 = 0.905).

Highlights

  • Spinal fusion surgeries are on the rise all over the world due to aging populations and a trend towards accepting elderly patients with increasingly complex medical histories [1,2]

  • The fat fraction determined by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) was found to have a high correlation with those determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), with a Pearson coefficient of 0.950 (P< 0.001) as compared with Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements calculated from the MRI technique

  • Phantom fat fraction measurements PDFF values calculated via MRI were found to be statistically similar to the known fat fraction values of the reference phantom (P = 0.187)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal fusion surgeries are on the rise all over the world due to aging populations and a trend towards accepting elderly patients with increasingly complex medical histories [1,2]. There are several guidance techniques for accurate and safe pedicle screw placement. These include navigation systems and other non-imaging based techniques [14]. The accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement as reported in the literature are as low as 27.6% and as high as 96.5% based on a meta-analysis by Kosmopoulous et al [15]. A more recent meta-analysis study found an accuracy range of 5092% [16] These inaccuracies translates into screw revisions being needed in 6.0% of operated patients, according to a recent systematic review by Staartjes et al [17]. There is a need for more reliable and cost-effective solutions for increasing the accuracy and safety in the placement of spinal screw implants during spinal fusion surgery

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call