Abstract
This paper tries to determine the best back-calculation formula (BCF) for cod otoliths. The cod were tagged individually and measured regularly throughout a 3-year period. Six different BCFs were compared: (1) Fraser–Lee with an intercept estimated from a linear regression of fish length (L) on otolith length (S), (2) Fraser—Lee with an intercept estimated from a symmetrical regression line of L on S; (3) the ‘body proportional hypothesis’ (BPH) for linear relationship; (4) the ‘scale proportional hypothesis’ (SPH) for linear relationship; (5) the BPH for non-linear relationship; and (6) the SPH for non-linear relationship. The ‘body proportional hypothesis’ seems to be more correct than the ‘scale proportional hypothesis’, and the non-linear BCF seems to give the best results for cod otoliths.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
