Abstract

Background External validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) prediction model is important before implementation in other settings. The primary aim of this study is to validate the Grobman prenatal VBAC calculator in the Ethiopian setting. Secondarily, the study was aimed at developing and comparing a new VBAC model that includes both the prenatal and intrapartum variables. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted, complemented by a medical chart review of 268 women admitted at three teaching hospitals of Addis Ababa University and who underwent a trial of labor after one prior cesarean birth. Maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, prior vaginal delivery, prior VBAC, and prior cesarean delivery indication type were included in the Grobman model. Observed delivery outcomes were recorded and then compared with the outcomes predicted by the calculator. We assessed the predictive abilities of the Grobman model and the new model using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with successful VBAC. Results Out of the 268 participants, 186 (69.4%) (95% CI 57.5-81.3) had successful VBAC. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the Grobman model was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.81). Notably, the novel model including both the prenatal and intrapartum variables had a better predictive value than the original model, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93). Prior VBAC, prepregnancy BMI, fetal membrane status, and fetal station at admission were predictors of VBAC in the newly developed logistic regression model. Conclusions The success rate of VBAC was similar to other sub-Saharan African countries. The Grobman model performed adequately in the study setting; however, the model including both the prenatal and intrapartum variables was more predictive. Thus, intrapartum predictors used in the new model should be considered during intrapartum counseling.

Highlights

  • The increasing cesarean delivery rate in both the developed and developing countries, including Ethiopia, raises concerns regarding the management of subsequent deliveries after cesarean delivery [1]

  • BioMed Research International or rupture are good candidates to attempt a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC), provided that they deliver at an institution staffed by physicians and anesthesiologists with adequate resources

  • We developed an additional multivariate logistic regression model to predict successful VBAC, which included both antepartum variables and intrapartum variables based on reports of previous studies [11, 12, 23, 24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increasing cesarean delivery rate in both the developed and developing countries, including Ethiopia, raises concerns regarding the management of subsequent deliveries after cesarean delivery [1]. External validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) prediction model is important before implementation in other settings. The primary aim of this study is to validate the Grobman prenatal VBAC calculator in the Ethiopian setting. The study was aimed at developing and comparing a new VBAC model that includes both the prenatal and intrapartum variables. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, complemented by a medical chart review of 268 women admitted at three teaching hospitals of Addis Ababa University and who underwent a trial of labor after one prior cesarean birth. Prepregnancy BMI, prior vaginal delivery, prior VBAC, and prior cesarean delivery indication type were included in the Grobman model. The Grobman model performed adequately in the study setting; the model including both the prenatal and intrapartum variables was more predictive. Intrapartum predictors used in the new model should be considered during intrapartum counseling

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call