Validation of a single‐sample urinary C‐peptide creatinine ratio as a reproducible alternative to serum C‐peptide in patients with Type 2 diabetes

Abstract

Serum C-peptide can be used in Type 2 diabetes as a measure of endogenous insulin secretion, but practicalities of collection limit its routine clinical use. Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is a non-invasive alternative that is stable for at least 3 days at room temperature in boric acid preservative. We aimed to assess the utility of urine C-peptide creatinine ratio in individuals with Type 2 diabetes as an alternative to serum C-peptide. We assessed, in 77 individuals with Type 2 diabetes, the reproducibility of, and correlations between, fasting and postprandial urine C-peptide creatinine ratio and serum C-peptide, and the impact of renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)) on these correlations. Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio was at least as reproducible as serum C-peptide [fasting coefficient of variation mean (95% CI): 28 (21-35)% vs. 38 (26-59)% and 2-h post-meal 26 (18-33)% vs. 27 (20-34)%. Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio 2 h post-meal was correlated with stimulated serum C-peptide, both the 2-h value (r = 0.64, P < 0.001) and the 2-h area under the C-peptide curve (r = 0.63, P < 0.001). The association seen was similar in patients with and without moderate renal impairment (P = 0.6). In patients with Type 2 diabetes, a single urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is a stable, reproducible measure that is well correlated with serum C-peptide following meal stimulation, even if there is moderate renal impairment. Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio therefore has potential for use in clinical practice in the assessment of Type 2 diabetes.