Abstract

We aimed to assess the validity of the self-report questionnaire for periodontitis in a Japanese population. A Japanese 9-item self-report questionnaire, developed by translating English-version questions that were used to detect periodontitis, was validated against full-mouth clinically-assessed periodontitis in 949 Japanese adults (average age = 43.2 years). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), wherein the periodontitis case definition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology was considered the gold standard. Severe, moderate, and mild periodontitis were identified in 6.2%, 30.0%, and 6.7% of the study population, respectively. Self-reported oral health questions combined with socio-demographic and health-related variables had an AUC > 0.70 (range, 0.71–0.87) for any periodontitis category. Four oral health questions (“have gum disease,” “loose tooth,” “lost bone,” and “bleeding gums”) were selected in the parsimonious model for severe periodontitis. The periodontitis screening score generated by the responses to these four questions had an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 73.1%, and 74.3%, respectively, where the cut-off was set at 2 points. In conclusion, a locally adapted version of the self-report questionnaire had an acceptable diagnostic capacity for the detection of periodontitis in this study population.

Highlights

  • We aimed to assess the validity of the self-report questionnaire for periodontitis in a Japanese population

  • Population level surveillance of periodontitis is challenging. This is mirrored by the current situation in Japan where the number of individuals participating in the Survey of Dental Diseases in Japan (SDD), is ­decreasing[2]

  • An 8-item questionnaire was proposed in a collaboration between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP)[12,16,17,18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We aimed to assess the validity of the self-report questionnaire for periodontitis in a Japanese population. A Japanese 9-item self-report questionnaire, developed by translating English-version questions that were used to detect periodontitis, was validated against full-mouth clinicallyassessed periodontitis in 949 Japanese adults (average age = 43.2 years). Starting with the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycle, the eight questions were included in the protocol and will serve to monitor the prevalence of periodontitis in American dentate adults aged > 30 years over time, instead of a clinical periodontal examination. This CDC/AAP questionnaire has been validated in an American ­population[12,17,19]. The most widely used questionnaire is that of the CDC/AAP20

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call