Validation of a scanning technique with minimal compression for measuring muscle volume with freehand 3D ultrasound

Abstract

Freehand 3D ultrasound (3D-US) is a promising technique for measuring muscle volume but it requires gel pads or water tanks to limit probe compression on the skin which makes it hard to use in clinical applications. Our objectives were to measure the effect of different compressions on muscle volume in order to assess the clinical applicability of a minimal compression method for lower limb muscles. 4 muscles of the lower limb on 15 healthy volunteers were scanned with a new commercial freehand 3D-US setup accessible to clinical experimentators. Each muscle was scanned with 3 levels of compression: standard compression, minimal compression and gel pad (method validated against MRI). Volume was calculated using software segmentation tools. Acquisitions and segmentations were done by the same examiner. There was a significant impact of standard compression on volume measurements, but no difference between minimal compression and gel pad. Standard compression underestimated volume with a mean bias of 16 mL. For minimal compression, 75 % of measured differences were below the predefined clinically acceptable limits of 10 mL. Mean bias for this method was 1.1 mL. In conclusion, standard compression in freehand 3D-US induces a systematic bias in volume calculations. But, with a trained examiner and the necessary precautions to minimize compression, this bias could be abolished and become acceptable in clinical applications. When a high accuracy is required, gel pads could still be important to consider.