Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the predictive performance of Epic Systems Corporation’s proprietary intensive care unit (ICU) mortality risk model (IMRM) with that of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated from January 1, 2008, through January 1, 2018. This single-center study was performed at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), a tertiary care teaching and referral center. The primary outcome was death in the ICU. Discrimination of each risk model for hospital mortality was assessed by comparing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).ResultsThe cohort mostly comprised older patients (median age, 64 years) and men (56.7%). The mortality rate of the cohort was 3.5% (2251 of 63,775 patients). The AUROC for mortality prediction was 89.7% (95% CI, 89.5% to 89.9%) for the IMRM, which was significantly greater than the AUROC of 88.2% (95% CI, 87.9% to 88.4%) for APACHE IV (P<.001).ConclusionThe IMRM was superior to the commonly used APACHE IV score and may be easily integrated into electronic health records at any hospital using Epic software.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.