Abstract

Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of gaseous emissions from combustion engines are very demanding due to the complex geometry, the emissions formation mechanisms, and the transient processes inside the cylinders. The validation of emission simulation is challenging because of modeling simplifications, fundamental differences from reality (e.g., fuel surrogates), and difficulty in the comparison with measured emission values, which depend on the measuring position. In this study, detailed gaseous emission data were acquired for a spark ignition (SI) direct-injection (DI) single-cylinder engine (SCE) fueled with a toluene reference fuel (TRF) surrogate to allow precise comparison with simulations. Multiple devices in different sampling locations were used for the measurement of average emission concentration, as well as hydrocarbon (HC) cycle- and species-resolved values. A RANS 3D-CFD methodology to predict gaseous pollutants was developed and validated with this experimental database. For precise validation, the emission comparison was performed in the exact same locations as the pollutants were measured. Additionally, the same surrogate fuel used in the measurements was defined in the simulation. To focus on the emission prediction, the pressure and heat release traces were reproduced by calibrating a G-equation flame propagation model. The differences of simulation results with measurements were within 4% for CO2, while for O2 and NO, the deviations were within 26%. CO emissions were generally overestimated probably because of inaccuracies in mixture formation. For HC emissions, deviations up to 50% were observed possibly due to inexact estimation of the influence of the piston-ring crevice geometry. The reasonable prediction accuracy in the RANS context makes the method a useful framework for the analysis of emissions from SI engines, as well as for mechanism validation under engine relevant conditions.

Highlights

  • The modeling of pollutant emissions from internal combustion engines is of great importance for the development of future low-emission powertrains

  • This study aims to provide a rigorous validation of a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methodology for gaseous emission predictions

  • Rich tails can be observed for all the operating points

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The modeling of pollutant emissions from internal combustion engines is of great importance for the development of future low-emission powertrains. One aspect regards the surrogate fuel used in CFD that, due to its simpler composition, fails in the prediction of all the chemical and physical characteristics of market real fuels (e.g., distillation curve) [18]. For this reason, a few simulation studies used surrogate fuels with a large number of components to reproduce the evaporation curve of real fuels [8]. Validation requires a comparison in the location where the emission measurements are performed It was shown in previous works [18,19] that the emission measuring position has a strong impact on the average emission level and cycle-resolved trends. Validation studies reported in the literature rarely provide details on how the computed emissions were evaluated when compared to experiments

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call