Abstract

Recent improvements of computers and numerical tools gave engineers a possibility to develop and use very complex numerical models. One of the essential steps in the model developing is a process of verification and validation. Traditionally, comparisons of time histories on a graph have been used to make subjective engineering judgments, how well the histories agree or disagree. In order to introduce an objective assessment of agreement between simulation and experimental results of two validation metrics were presented in this paper. The Area validation metrics and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, based on the comparison of the cumulative probability functions, were used for validation of developed model of a rail vehicle. The obtained results have shown that presented validation metrics may be used for the model validation. However, the subjective judgment in the process of the validation cannot be completely avoided. The future work should be focused on development of a new validation metric which will eliminate subjective judgment in the process of the model validation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.