Abstract
IntroductionCardiac liabilities represent a major cause of recent withdrawal of marketed drugs and also for the high attrition rate evidenced during late stage drug development. To identify molecules with potential cardiovascular risks early in drug development, a screening model of ex vivo Langendorff hearts has been validated with 26 reference compounds of various chemical and therapeutic classes. MethodsThe hearts of adult guinea pigs were maintained by retrograde perfusion in Langendorff mode, beating spontaneously at sinus rhythm or paced via the right atrium at 200 and 300 beats per minute. Multiple parameters consisting of hemodynamic function (coronary and left ventricle pressure), cardiac electrophysiology (electrocardiogram and monophasic action potential) and indices of arrhythmogenesis (triangulation, reverse-use dependence, repolarization dispersion and beat-to-beat instability), together with overt arrhythmia were evaluated simultaneously. Ascending concentrations up to either 100-fold of the determined hERG IC50 or nominally 100 µM were routinely tested utilizing 4–6 hearts per compound. ResultsEach compound exhibited a unique cardiovascular profile: (i) the majority displayed concentration and heart rate-dependent mixed-ion channel or multiple-target effects that frequently resulted in bradycardia, atrioventricular block, negative inotropy, coronary vasodilatation, and QRS widening. (ii) Compounds associated with high arrhythmogenic risk in the clinic exhibited more “positive signals” at concentrations within 30-fold of their maximal therapeutic free plasma concentration than those with less arrhythmogenic potential. (iii) For several potent torsadogens, proarrhythmic indices other than the prolongation of QT/QTc and MAP duration appeared more sensitive in representing proarrhythmic liability. (iv) A scoring system was developed to assist in the rank-ordering of potential cardiotoxicants. DiscussionThe cardiovascular action of reference compounds profiled by this isolated heart model was generally consistent with their known mechanisms and, except for the sinus heart rate, correlated well with that observed in the clinic. Further, the overall cardiac liability estimated by the scoring system matched the clinical documentation, suggesting this model could serve as a valuable tool in early cardiovascular drug safety assessment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.