Abstract

Reliability in visual cardiotocography interpretation is unsatisfying, which has led to the development of computerized cardiotocography. Computerized analysis is well established for antenatal fetal surveillance but has yet not performed sufficiently during labor. We aimed to investigate the capacity of a new computerized algorithm compared with visual assessment in identifying intrapartum fetal heart rate baseline and decelerations. In all, 312 intrapartum cardiotocography tracings with variable decelerations were analyzed by the computerized algorithm and visually examined by two observers, blinded to each other and the computer analysis. The width, depth and area of each deceleration was measured. Four cases (>100 variable decelerations) were subjected to in-depth detailed analysis. The outcome measures were bias in seconds (width), beats per minute (depth), and beats (area) between computer and observers using Bland-Altman analysis. Interobserver reliability was determined by calculating intraclass correlation and Spearman rank analysis. The analysis (312 cases) showed excellent intraclass correlation (0.89-0.95) and very strong Spearman correlation (0.82-0.91). The detailed analysis of >100 decelerations in four cases revealed low bias between the computer and the two observers; width 1.4 and 1.4 seconds, depth 5.1 and 0.7 beats per minute, and area 0.1 and -1.7 beats. This was comparable to the bias between the two observers: 0.3 seconds (width), 4.4 beats per minute (depth) and 1.7 beats (area). The intraclass correlation was excellent (0.90-.98). A novel computerized algorithm for intrapartum cardiotocography analysis is as accurate as gold standard visual assessment, with high correlation and low bias.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call