Abstract

Developing accurate models of plasma dynamics is essential for confident predictive modeling of current and future fusion devices. In modern computer science and engineering, formal verification and validation processes are used to assess model accuracy and establish confidence in the predictive capabilities of a given model. This paper provides an overview of the key guiding principles and best practices for the development of validation metrics, illustrated using examples from investigations of turbulent transport in magnetically confined plasmas. Particular emphasis is given to the importance of uncertainty quantification and its inclusion within the metrics, and the need for utilizing synthetic diagnostics to enable quantitatively meaningful comparisons between simulation and experiment. As a starting point, the structure of commonly used global transport model metrics and their limitations is reviewed. An alternate approach is then presented, which focuses upon comparisons of predicted local fluxes, fluctuations, and equilibrium gradients against observation. The utility of metrics based upon these comparisons is demonstrated by applying them to gyrokinetic predictions of turbulent transport in a variety of discharges performed on the DIII-D tokamak [J. L. Luxon, Nucl. Fusion 42, 614 (2002)], as part of a multi-year transport model validation activity.

Highlights

  • All models are wrong, but some are useful. —George E

  • Particular emphasis is given to the importance of uncertainty quantification and its inclusion within the metrics, and the need for utilizing synthetic diagnostics to enable quantitatively meaningful comparisons between simulation and experiment

  • The utility of metrics based upon these comparisons is demonstrated by applying them to gyrokinetic predictions of turbulent transport in a variety of discharges performed on the DIII-D tokamak [J

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Given the importance of rigorous validation studies in many fields, it is no surprise that there is a broad and well-established literature in the field, ranging from guidelines and best practices prescribed by professional societies[1,5] to journal reviews[6,7,8,9,10,11] and textbooks,[12,13] in addition to the numerous articles and reports detailing the outcomes of individual studies. A common feature of both these reviews and the broader literature is the identification of validation metrics as key components of any serious, robust validation study While both the Terry et al and Greenwald reviews discuss these metrics in some detail, including potential mathematical formulations, both emphasize the need for further work. Of these issues, this paper will use the formulation of validation metrics relevant for turbulent transport in MFE plasmas as a type of worked example.

OVERVIEW OF KEY VALIDATION CONCEPTS
Historical transport modeling metrics
BUILDING ROBUST LOCAL TURBULENT TRANSPORT VALIDATION METRICS
Quantifying uncertainties in power balance fluxes
V0 ðx d3x0
Quantifying the uncertainty in the local driving gradient
Quantifying the uncertainty in the simulation predictions
Example
Using flux-matching gradients to construct validation metrics
Alternative metric formulations
VALIDATION METRICS FOR PREDICTIONS OF TURBULENT FLUCTUATIONS
Frequency-spectra based fluctuation analysis and comparisons
Fluctuation Comparisons Based on Spatial Correlation Properties
Fluctuation sensitivity plots and validation metrics
USING COMPOSITE METRICS FOR ASSESSING OVERALL MODEL FIDELITY
Findings
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call