Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: In some professions, wellness has become shorthand for physical fitness and nutrition but dimensions outside the physical are equally important. As wellness models continue to materialize, a validated instrument is needed to substantiate the characteristics of a multidimensional wellness model. Purpose: This 2-pronged study focused on the testing of the factor structure of the Multidimensional Wellness Inventory (MDWI) and comparisons between student-athletes (SAs) and nonathletes (NAs) as well as first-generation (FGs) and non-first-generation students (NFGs). Methods: Part I tested the construct validity of the instrument using confirmatory factor analysis (N = 1699). Part II compared wellness scores among SAs, NAs, FGs, and NFGs using independent sample t tests (N = 990). Results: Part I revealed that a revised factor structure for the MDWI was preferred. Part II showed statistically significant differences in 5 of 9 wellness constructs. FGs did not have statistically significant different scores than NFGs. Discussion: Outcomes demonstrate that a multidimensional approach and a valid instrument are imperative within the college population regardless of their involvement in athletics and their FG/NFG designation. Translation to Health Education Practice: The study is significant to college Health Educators for planning and evaluation purposes to gauge students’ multidimensional wellness status.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call