Abstract

Introduction. Manual delineation of the left ventricle is clinical standard for quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images despite being time consuming and observer dependent. Previous automatic methods generally do not account for one major contributor to stroke volume, the long-axis motion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate an automatic algorithm for time-resolved segmentation covering the whole left ventricle, including basal slices affected by long-axis motion. Methods. Ninety subjects imaged with a cine balanced steady state free precession sequence were included in the study (training set n = 40, test set n = 50). Manual delineation was reference standard and second observer analysis was performed in a subset (n = 25). The automatic algorithm uses deformable model with expectation-maximization, followed by automatic removal of papillary muscles and detection of the outflow tract. Results. The mean differences between automatic segmentation and manual delineation were EDV −11 mL, ESV 1 mL, EF −3%, and LVM 4 g in the test set. Conclusions. The automatic LV segmentation algorithm reached accuracy comparable to interobserver for manual delineation, thereby bringing automatic segmentation one step closer to clinical routine. The algorithm and all images with manual delineations are available for benchmarking.

Highlights

  • Manual delineation of the left ventricle is clinical standard for quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images despite being time consuming and observer dependent

  • A comparison between automatic segmentation and manual delineation can be seen in Figure 5 for a basal, midventricular, and apical slice in end-diastole and end-systole

  • In the additional file a timeresolved 3D-rendering of left ventricle shows the long-axis motion of the epicardial surface resulting from the automatic segmentation algorithm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Manual delineation of the left ventricle is clinical standard for quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images despite being time consuming and observer dependent. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can provide diagnostic information about the left ventricle (LV) with clinical parameters such as end-diastolic volume (EDV), endsystolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular mass (LVM), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), peak ejection rate, peak filling rate, and regional wall thickening. To extract these clinical parameters current clinical practice is to perform endocardial and epicardial delineations manually, which is time consuming and often only performed in end-diastole and end-systole [1]. Petitjean and Dacher [3] pointed out that it is hard to conclude on superiority of any of the previously proposed methods since the results are obtained

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call