Abstract
A refined classification of aerosol types is essential to identify and control air pollution sources. This study focused on improving the resolution and accuracy of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and further refining the classification of aerosol types in China. We validated the accuracy of the AOD acquired using the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA2) and Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) by comparing it with that acquired using from the Aeronet Robotic Network (AERONET). We simulated the AOD with high spatial resolution and accuracy based on the extremely randomized trees (ERT), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT) models and identified aerosol types based on the Angstrom Exponent (AE) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the calibrated AOD. The results showed that CAMS overestimates AOD (21.4 %) and MERRA2 underestimates AOD (−17.3 %). Among the three machine learning models, the ERT model performed best, with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.825 and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.174. Biomass burning/urban-industrial aerosols dominated China, with the largest contributions to southern, eastern, and central China in spring and summer. Clean continental aerosols contributed the most to southwestern China in fall and winter, whereas desert dust aerosols contributed the most to northwestern and eastern China in spring.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.