Abstract

Abstract The present study verified whether adult listeners retain the ability to improve non-native speech perception and if it can be significantly enhanced in the formal context, a very impoverished context with respect to the natural one. We tested (i) whether perceptual learning is possible for adults in a classroom context during focused phonetic lessons, and (ii) whether it follows the pattern predicted for natural acquisition by the PAM-L2 [1]. The results showed that adult listeners are still able to improve foreign sound perception and this ability seems to occur also in formal contexts in line with the PAM-L2 predictions. Index Terms : non-native phone perception, foreign language acquisition, PAM. 1. Introduction The dominant theories in second language (L2) phoneme acquisition argue that perceptual similarity/dissimilarity between the sounds of L2 and native language (L1) governs their assimilation or non-assimilation and dictates their learnability in adulthood. According to the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM) [2], subjects with learning an L2 in classroom context (FLA), most of them limited L2 instruction, especially that typified by classroom-only education with instructors with a strong L1 accent, can be considered as naive listeners, i.e., functional monolinguals not actively learning or using an L2. The PAM assumes that the way naive listeners assimilate non -native phones to native phonemes is determined by the detection of commonalities between them [3]. The PAM predicts that the non-native phones can be Categorized or not consistently categorised (i.e., Uncategorized) as exemplars of native phonemes, falling between two or more L1 phonemes. Finally, non-native phones cannot be categorised at all as speech sounds. If two Categorized non-native phones are perceived as acceptable exemplars of two different native phonemes, a very good/excellent discrimination is predicted (Two Category assimilation, TC). Conversely, poor discrimination is expected for Single Category (SC) assimilation, where two non-native phones are perceived as equally good or poor exemplars of a single native phoneme. If two non-native phones are both perceived as a single native phoneme but differ in rating, intermediate degree of discrimination is predicted (Category Goodness assimilation; CG). For the Uncategorized phones, if one non-native phone is perceived as a native phoneme and the other is perceived as an uncategorised speech sound, the predicted degree of discrimination is good (Uncategorised-Categorised assimilation, UC). Two non-native phones assimilated to partially-similar native phonemes will be discriminated from poor to moderate (Uncategorised-Uncategorised assimilation; UU). Finally, the predicted discrimination is good/excellent for the Non assimilable typology (NA) since two non-native phones are not perceived as any speech sound and are easily distinguishable from each other. A recent extension of this model, i.e., the PAM-L2 [1], refers to adult L2 learners in an L2 immersion context, for which a common L1-L2 system (i.e., an interlanguage) is developing. The L2 perceptual learning seems to be determined by the increase in L2 vocabulary size that causes the learners to

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call