Abstract
The pelvic floor literature on surgical trials and research utilizes heterogeneous outcomes measures that render interpretation and comparison of results between groups challenging. This chapter comprises a selected review of objective and subjective outcomes measures that are used to assess stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) procedures. The methodology of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument validation is briefly reviewed.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
