Valid and reliable diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT in anterior cruciate ligament rupture

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) can be used to accurately and reliably detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.Materials and methodsParticipants with unilateral ACL rupture were prospectively enrolled, and the bilateral knees were scanned by DECT. A tissue-specific mapping algorithm was applied to improve the visualization of the ACLs. The 80-keV CT value, mixed-keV CT value, electron density (Rho), and effective atomic number (Zeff) were measured to quantitatively differentiate torn ACLs from normal ACLs. MRI and arthroscopy served as the reference standards.ResultsFifty-one participants (mean age, 27.0 ± 8.7 years; 31 men) were enrolled. Intact and torn ACLs were explicitly differentiated on color-coded DECT images. The 80-keV CT value, mixed-keV CT value, and Rho were significantly lower for the torn ACLs than for the intact ACLs (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff values were an 80-keV CT value of 61.8 HU, a mixed-keV CT value of 60.9 HU, and a Rho of 51.8 HU, with AUCs of 98.0% (95% CI: 97.0–98.9%), 99.2% (95% CI: 98.6–99.7%), and 99.8% (95% CI: 99.6–100.0%), respectively. Overall, DECT had almost perfect reliability and validity in detecting ACL integrity (sensitivity = 97.1% [95% CI: 88.1–99.8%]; specificity = 98.0% [95% CI: 89.5–99.9%]; PPV = 98.0% [95% CI: 93.0–99.8%]; NPV = 97.1% [95% CI: 91.7–99.4%]; accuracy = 97.5% [95% CI: 94.3–99.2%]). There was no evidence of a difference between MRI and DECT in the diagnostic performance (p > 0.99).ConclusionDECT has excellent diagnostic accuracy and reliability in qualitatively and quantitatively diagnosing ACL rupture.Clinical relevance statementDECT could validly and reliably diagnose ACL rupture using both qualitative and quantitative methods, which may become a promising substitute for MRI to evaluate the integrity of injured ACLs and the maturity of postoperative ACL autografts.Key Points• On color-coded DECT images, an uncolored ACL was a reliable sign for qualitatively diagnosing ACL rupture.• The 80-keV CT value, mixed-keV CT value, and Rho were significantly lower for the torn ACLs than for the intact ACLs, which contributed to the quantitative diagnosis of ACL rupture.• DECT had an almost perfect diagnostic performance for ACL rupture, and diagnostic capability was comparable between MRI and DECT.