Abstract

We study the vacuum stability and perturbativity conditions in the minimal type-II seesaw model. These conditions give characteristic constraints to model parameters. In the model, there is a $SU(2)_L$ triplet scalar field, which could cause a large Higgs mass correction. From the naturalness point of view, heavy Higgs masses should be lower than $350\,{\rm GeV}$, which can be testable by the LHC Run-II results. Due to effects of the triplet scalar field, branching ratios of the Higgs decay ($h\to \gamma \gamma, Z\gamma$) deviate from the standard model, and large parameter region is excluded by the recent ATLAS and CMS combined analysis of $h\to \gamma \gamma$. Our result of the signal strength for $h\to \gamma \gamma$ is $R_{\gamma \gamma} \lesssim 1.1$, but its deviation is too small to observe at the LHC experiment.

Highlights

  • Current experimental results at the LHC are almost consistent with the predictions in the standard model (SM)

  • Rγ γ can be enhanced by both H ± and H ±± contributions for λ4 < 0, there is no parameter space in λ4 < 0 region for M ≤ 1 TeV. This result comes from the vacuum stability conditions, and we note that Rγ γ is not strongly enhanced compared to the literature; see for example Refs. [55,56]

  • We have studied the vacuum stability and perturbativity conditions in the minimal type-II seesaw model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current experimental results at the LHC are almost consistent with the predictions in the standard model (SM). There are additional particles to the SM: the SM gauge singlet Majorana neutrinos, an SU (2)L triplet scalar field with hypercharge Y = 2, and an SU (2)L triplet fermion with hypercharge Y = 0 in type-I [2,3,4,5], II [6,7,8,9,10,11], and III [12] seesaw mechanism, respectively. We do not consider such a symmetry, but impose a naturalness condition that contributions of the heavy triplet scalar field should be lower than the measured Higgs mass.

Review of the type-II seesaw model
Z cos2
Vacuum stability and naturalness
Numerical analysis
Allowed parameter space
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call